From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-43066-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5671 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 05:37:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 5658 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2006 05:37:57 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:37:55 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id HZV37376; 	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:37:44 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-206-22.inter.net.il [80.230.206.22]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id CUJ61094 (AUTH halo1); 	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:37:43 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:43:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u64n0qc0l.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602262204560.9819@localhost.localdomain> (message 	from Wu Zhou on Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:34:40 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602240250300.7628@localhost.localdomain>  <uek1t9nu6.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602262204560.9819@localhost.localdomain>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:34:40 -0500 (EST)
> From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > > + type = Type bar
> > > +     int4 :: c
> > > +     real*4 :: d
> > > + End Type bar
> > 
> > Btw, isn't it more consistent to print "integer*4" instead of "int4"?
> > Either that, or just "integer", I think.  Or is "int4" a valid type
> > name in f90?  (The last Fortran I used was f77, so please forgive my
> > ignorance.)
> 
> Yes. I also think so.  But the name of "int4" is got from the DWARF tag:
> 
>  <1><e6>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_base_type)
>      DW_AT_name        : int4
>      DW_AT_byte_size   : 4
>      DW_AT_encoding    : 5      (signed)

Well, we don't need t print everything DWARF-2 throws at us verbatim.
If you agree with my suggestions, I say let's use them.  Are there any
problems with that?

> + For a variable of derived type, the @code{print} command will output the
> + value of all its members, including its nested derived type .
                                                               ^^
An extra space.

> + Please note that in the above example, the result of @code{print q} is

@kbd{print q}, since it's what the user types at her keyboard.

Otherwise okay, thanks.