From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-44322-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31710 invoked by alias); 23 May 2006 19:24:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 30407 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2006 19:23:21 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 May 2006 19:21:52 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id ITY34385; 	Tue, 23 May 2006 22:16:34 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-210-108.inter.net.il [83.130.210.108]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id DLD42641 (AUTH halo1); 	Tue, 23 May 2006 22:16:33 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 19:48:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u64jwft64.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <vt2wtcc62t7.fsf@theseus.home.> (message from Jim Blandy on Tue, 	23 May 2006 10:58:28 -0700)
Subject: Re: [committed] update gdb.texinfo for "set/show cygwin-exceptions"
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20060522041938.GA7733@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <ud5e5ga1y.fsf@gnu.org> 	<20060523045453.GA26424@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <vt2wtcc62t7.fsf@theseus.home.>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2

> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:58:28 -0700
> 
> I don't know what sort of history you and Eli have

AFAIK, we have no history.  A couple of intense technical arguments,
maybe, but I always thought we've succeeded to stay technical.  I
guess I was wrong...