From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-51105-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14882 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2007 07:44:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 14872 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2007 07:44:44 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:44:42 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-247-203.inter.net.il [83.130.247.203]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id DUB84208 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:44:33 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:44:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u641k8z6l.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: uweigand@de.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <uabqw90w0.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 06 	Oct 2007 09:07:43 +0200)
Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] [1/3] Remove stabs target macros: VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200710051805.l95I5D78029197@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <uabqw90w0.fsf@gnu.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:07:43 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:05:13 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
> > 
> > this converts the VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK target macro into a gdbarch callback.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > doc/ChangeLog:
> > 
> > 	* gdbint.texinfo: Document gdbarch_variables_inside_block
> > 	instead of VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK.
> 
> This part is approved.

Oops, not quite: please state the name(s) of the node(s) where you
made the changes.

Thanks.