Re: [RFA 01/08] multi-process support: struct inferior (alternate manual content)

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:32:30 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Here is an alternate phrasing for GDB's new inferior objects, 
> wordsmithed so that it (mostly) makes sense with just Pedro's patches, 
> and also so that it can be easily expanded into the full multi-exec 
> section in the near future. To repeat from my last comment, I don't 
> think we need to be really polished just yet, the single-exec + 
> multi-inferior case is just a transitional stage of limited interest.
> 
> Stan
> 
> 2008-09-16  Stan Shebs  <stan@codesourcery.com>
> 
>     * gdb.texinfo (Inferiors): New section.

Thanks, this is okay.

> +                                An inferior typically corresponds to a
> + process, but is more general and applies also to targets that do not
> + have processes.

An example of an inferior that is not a process will help here.

Also, please make sure there are 2 spaces between each 2 sentences.