From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15049 invoked by alias); 23 May 2006 19:48:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14984 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2006 19:48:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 May 2006 19:48:41 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-210-108.inter.net.il [83.130.210.108]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EGK20721 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 23 May 2006 22:37:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060523045453.GA26424@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Tue, 23 May 2006 00:54:53 -0400) Subject: Re: [committed] update gdb.texinfo for "set/show cygwin-exceptions" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060522041938.GA7733@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060523045453.GA26424@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:54:53 -0400 > From: Christopher Faylor > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:59:37PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 00:19:38 -0400 > >> From: Christopher Faylor > >> > >> 2006-05-22 Christopher Faylor > >> > >> * gdb.texinfo (Cygwin Native): Document set/show cygwin-exceptions. > > > >Thanks. > > There is no need to thank me. It strikes me as pretty disingenuous given > your past views about Cygwin. > > If you think my wording or usage is wrong then please just change it and > don't bother with the false gratitude. Chris, To say the truth, I'm speechless. What does one say in response to such an unprovoked assault? Would it help to say that, no matter what are my opinions about the technical aspects of Cygwin, I'm treating it as any other supported GDB port, and so would like its commands to be documented as well as those of other ports? That, no matter how many times I re-read my message, I cannot find any hint there--not one--of being disingenuous, or of false gratitude, or of any other bad attitude towards you personally or Cygwin in general. All I find is IMHO a polite and technical response. If you had a long and bad day, I'm sorry, but I'm pretty sure I had nothing to do with that. I don't think I deserve such an attack for doing my job.