From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10538 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2006 18:30:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 10526 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2006 18:30:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:30:17 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-59-105.inter.net.il [80.230.59.105]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EWR36744 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:30:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Nick Roberts CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <17551.10938.599796.89658@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:14:34 +1200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI Doco Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <17535.33986.598009.914783@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17536.4472.263731.425097@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17538.8607.697546.427486@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17546.915.125070.943811@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.15381.217912.425365@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.60705.62123.543072@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17548.36381.999594.50258@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17549.1830.40223.127804@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060613044551.030C51D3550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17551.10938.599796.89658@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:14:34 +1200 > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > > > Now please post only the new parts, the ones I've never seen. Please > > > > don't commit anything before that. > > > > > > I'm not sure where this is leading because at some stage I will want to > > > commit the parts that you have already seen and approved. It would be > > > easier for me to commit those now and submit a patch for the new parts, > > > so that there is no more confusion about what you are approving. Would > > > that be OK? > > > > I no longer have a clear idea what do you mean by ``those'' patches > > that you want to commit. > > No, but I have a clear idea about what you have approved and what you may not > have seen. You could choose to trust me. If I somehow sounded like I didn't trust you, I apologize: I never meant anything like that. Of course I trust you; I just need to see the parts I didn't yet review. That is all I asked for above: that you point me to those unseen parts, or post them separately, whatever is more convenient. > > You responded with this message: > > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00117.html > > > > where you seemed to say that the patch included in the message was the > > previous one, with my comments fixed and some node reordering. I > > approved the reordering, which I thought to be the only new part (in > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-06/msg00121.html). If the > > patch from msg00117.html included something other than what I thought > > it did, please tell me where to look to find the new parts. > > Clearly they're in msg00117.html, more specifically everything after and > including "@subsubheading A Bad Command". That was the clue I was missing. So everything after this @subsubheading is the stuff I should review, right? I will do that soon. Thanks.