From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9216 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 22:39:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 9202 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2006 22:39:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:39:13 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-196-83.inter.net.il [83.130.196.83]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FBC48445 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 00:39:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:39:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: David Taylor CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <200610311418.k9VEI3pN004364@mailhub.lss.emc.com> (message from David Taylor on Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:18:03 -0500) Subject: Re: stabs.texinfo update for macro define/undefine Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200610251931.k9PJVRDO011265@mailhub.lss.emc.com> <200610302225.k9UMPLZ9001050@mailhub.lss.emc.com> <200610311418.k9VEI3pN004364@mailhub.lss.emc.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 > cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:18:03 -0500 > From: David Taylor > > You mentioned it, but I guess I misunderstood. I ran both `make dvi' > and `make info' and looked at the resulting files. The info file > stayed in fewer than 80 columns; I didn't see any TeX complaints about > an overfull hbox, nor did the dvi file have a black box on any of > those lines. So, I guessed that they looked too long but were > actually okay. Maybe due to whitespace TeX succeeded to squeeze them in. > In the future, how should I test to make sure that the lines are not > too long? Any line longer than 64 characters in an @example should be shortened. > For this, how about: > > @example > .stabs "NONE 42",54,0,1,0 > .stabs "TWO(a,b) (a + (a) + 2 * b)",54,0,2,0 > .stabs "ONE(c) (c + 19)",54,0,3,0 > .stabs "ONE",58,0,10,0 > .stabs "ONE(c) (c + 23)",54,0,11,0 > @end example > > NOTE: In the example above, @code{54} is @code{N_MAC_DEFINE} and @code{58} > is @code{N_MAC_UNDEF}. > > ? This is the text in the patch attached below. This is fine; it's exactly what I was suggesting. > > With these changes, this can go in. Thanks. > > Thanks. I don't have write after approval privileges. I committed the patch for you. Thanks again for working on this.