Re: Docs and NEWS for breakpoint changes

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:27:34 +0400
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > > +pending breakpoint that never had its address known,
> > 
> > I think this is better:
> > 
> >   For a pending address whose address is not yet known,
> 	          ^^^^^^^
> 
> Did you mean "breakpoint" instead of first "address"?

Yes, sorry.

> > Example, please.  A picture is worth a thousand words.
> 
> I've added one. Is example with a line as long as 75 characters OK?

@smallexample can handle this (which is why we use it instead of
@example).

> Thanks for review. I attach the revised version.

It's fine, except for a few small gotchas:

> +It is possible that a breakpoints correspond to several locations 
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"a breakpoint corresponds".

> +For a C@t{++} constructor, the gcc compiler generates several
                                  ^^^
You forgot to replace with @value{NGCC}.

> +by one row for each breakpoint location. The header row
                                          ^^
Still only one space.

> +any shared library is loaded or unloaded. Typically, you would
                                           ^^
And here.