From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52938-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8966 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2007 16:08:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 8956 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Dec 2007 16:08:40 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:08:27 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-120-75.inter.net.il [84.229.120.75]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id EMM04871 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:07:32 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:05:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u4pe1xz5e.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bodzio131@op.pl
In-reply-to: <47765B26.5020808@portugalmail.pt> (message from Pedro Alves on 	Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:35:18 +0000)
Subject: Re: PR/2386 [1/2]: MinGW attach to process without an exec file
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <47744F79.5020706@portugalmail.pt> <uk5mxyces.fsf@gnu.org> <47765B26.5020808@portugalmail.pt>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00460.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:35:18 +0000
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, bodzio131@op.pl
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:20:57 +0000
> >> From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
> >> CC: Bogdan Slusarczyk <bodzio131@op.pl>
> >>
> >> 	(*-*-mingw* | *-*-cygwin*): Set gdb_osabi to GDB_OSABI_CYGWIN.
> > 
> > Is this really right?  Unless I'm missing something, GDB_OSABI_CYGWIN
> > is not the native Windows ABI, is it?
> > 
> 
> There is no Cygwin ABI, to the best of my knowledge, since Cygwin is a
> library that sits on top of Windows, it follows the Windows ABI.  When
> MinGW support was introduced, I didn't rename that.  I haven't found a
> reason to split Cygwin|MinGW at this level.  I was avoiding rename-only
> patches, in a rename-as-I-touch mode.

Thanks for explanations.