From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26547 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 20:31:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 26539 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2005 20:31:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:31:21 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-155-162.inter.net.il [80.230.155.162]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id DAW66186 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:30:02 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew STUBBS CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <43859673.8070107@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:31:15 +0000) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'Undefined command' error message Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051116201300.GA23472@nevyn.them.org> <4382072A.1010402@st.com> <43849117.5030805@st.com> <4384BD74.1060600@st.com> <20051123191940.GA20765@nevyn.them.org> <20051123210732.GA22982@nevyn.them.org> <43859673.8070107@st.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:31:15 +0000 > From: Andrew STUBBS > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > >>So if "u+1" returned 'unknown command "u+1"' instead, I think that > >>would be an acceptable change, especially if it reduces some > >>special-cases in the handling of commands. > > > > > > Thanks. Yes, I agree with that. > > > > Andrew, does this resolve your doubt about how to go about this issue? > > Yes, I think so. But just to comfirm, you are giving me permission to > commit the patch as it is? If the "u+1" issue is the only reason that prevented that (I simply forgot what exactly you said in your original message, sorry), then yes, you can commit the patches now.