From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20279 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2006 06:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 20270 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2006 06:56:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:56:21 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-148-207.inter.net.il [80.230.148.207]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EWT50379 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:56:17 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Nick Roberts CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <17552.31184.975862.692460@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:04:16 +1200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] MI Doco Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <17535.33986.598009.914783@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17536.4472.263731.425097@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17538.8607.697546.427486@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17546.915.125070.943811@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.15381.217912.425365@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17547.60705.62123.543072@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17548.36381.999594.50258@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17549.1830.40223.127804@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20060613044551.030C51D3550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17551.10938.599796.89658@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17552.31184.975862.692460@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:04:16 +1200 > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > Of course I trust you; I just need to see the parts I didn't yet > > review. > > No, I mean as a tactic i.e trust my ability to DTRT, rather than my integrity. Well, if you mean approve unreviewed patches, I don't think I can do that. It's not about trust, it's about another pair of eyes going through the patch. Granted, documentation cannot break the program, but the procedure for approving patches is the same. > Please remember though, the patch that I want to actually commit > will look quite different, because I also want to re-order the nodes. Reordering is a mechanical job that doesn't change any text, so there's no risk of introducing problems. Be sure to run makeinfo, though, before you commit.