From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53256-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6773 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 21:07:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 6761 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2008 21:07:35 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:07:16 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-42-152.inter.net.il [80.230.42.152]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id EPV48073 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:07:06 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:07:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u3at4rrzy.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
CC: schwab@suse.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:21:36 -0800)
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue?
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> <200801092140.43362.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200801101058.m0AAw7HA023877@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801101247.28736.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1200001622.14654.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:21:36 -0800
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Andreas, Eli, have your concerns been answered too? Just to recap,
> the proposal is the following. Considering the following code:
> 
>    1.  int
>    2.  my_procedure (...)
>    3.  {
>    4.    int local1 = ...;
>    5.    int local2 = ...;
>    6.    ...
> 
> The idea is that inserting a breakpoint on line 2 or 3 would be
> equivalent to breaking on "my_procedure", which means that the
> actual location will be line 4 (before the locals assignment
> take place).

Actually, I didn't have concern regarding your original patch, but now
that Mark raised the issue, I'm not sure what about his concerns.
Suppose I do want to step through the function prolog -- how would I
accomplish that after your changes?