From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-57916-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1105 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2008 03:19:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 1097 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2008 03:19:34 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:18:55 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K5I00B1LRUC54V1@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:18:13 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:19:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Add a third mode to "breakpoints always-inserted", and make it 	the default
In-reply-to: <20080812230558.GA3441@caradoc.them.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <u3al9hacg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <200808120034.25338.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200808122137.00425.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080812204026.GA27528@caradoc.them.org> <200808122245.22971.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080812230558.GA3441@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:05:58 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:45:22PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Somehow, I understood that he meant two separate issues: add
> > a cindex; and, wrap the always-inserted references in @code.
> > Then, I understood that you meant that I should add that line
> > somewhere else, a bit above, or down...
> > 
> > oh, well...
> 
> Sorry - now you've got it!

Yes, the last version is what I meant.

(Having more than one index entry with exactly the same text is not a
good idea, since the reader will not know which one to choose.)