From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24522 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2005 18:09:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24506 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2005 18:09:24 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:09:24 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-147-87.inter.net.il [80.230.147.87]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CBR41309 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:08:55 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Ingham CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Ingham on Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:07:43 -0700) Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Ingham > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:07:43 -0700 > > You don't want to run ALL cli commands through the mi command > equivalents because then the output would come out in mi form, not > cli form. I thought we wanted to have _both_ CLI and MI style response in this case: the CLI response to display in the command buffer, the MI response to be caught by the front end in order to change the display in other windows. Am I missing something?