From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1050 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 21:00:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 1039 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 21:00:23 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:00:23 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-164-161.inter.net.il [84.228.164.161]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CZU05048 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:00:18 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <437E38CA.1040300@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:25:46 -0800) Subject: Re: [RFA] Add new command class_experimental Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <437E38CA.1040300@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:25:46 -0800 > From: Michael Snyder > > This is to add a new category of gdb commands, "experimental". > These will be explicitly "use at your own risk", and gdb will > tell you so. Hmm... I'm not sure I like this idea. Why not add these as normal commands? If it's useful and stable enough, people will use it. As for possible bugs, the non-experimental stuff has those too.