Re: [RFC]: Patch to support Fortran derived type - Revised

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:20:50 +0800 (CST)
> From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Thomas.Koenig@online.de
> 
> Yes. I am thinking of adding these to gdb manual.  But I am not sure how 
> to organize them. As you know, we already have three subsection: Fortran 
> operators, Fortran defaults and special Fortran command.  Which section 
> should this kind of text gets into?  Maybe special Fortran commands? 

Yes, Fortran commands sounds like the right place.

> However I did added a few words in the Fortran operators section.  Here is 
> the patch:
> 
> Index: gdb.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.296
> diff -u -p -r1.296 gdb.texinfo
> --- gdb.texinfo	20 Nov 2005 06:12:59 -0000	1.296
> +++ gdb.texinfo	22 Nov 2005 07:05:01 -0000
> @@ -9159,6 +9159,10 @@ of the second one.
>  @item :
>  The range operator.  Normally used in the form of array(low:high) to
>  represent a section of array.
> +
> +@item %
> +Fortran 90 and afterwards use this to access the members of derived
> +type, which is also introduced after the Fortran 90.

Thanks, this is fine.