From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7664 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2006 20:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7653 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2006 20:00:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:00:24 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-46-240.inter.net.il [80.230.46.240]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DQS94531 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:00:17 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060228135310.GA25487@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:53:10 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060228135310.GA25487@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:53:10 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > Normally we try to honor the type names in debug info. If they make sense, sure. If they don't, I don't think we should blindly follow them. > If int4 is a bogus name for a type in Fortran, then this debug info > is bogus - gfortran should be fixed. I agree, but at least one version of gfortran that uses int4 is already out there, so I suggest that GDB handles that as we think it's right.