From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-43370-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13988 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2006 08:19:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 13980 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2006 08:19:50 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:19:49 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id IGL04960; 	Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:16:35 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-243-102.inter.net.il [83.130.243.102]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id CYX09777 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:16:32 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:23:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u1wwr547o.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
CC: sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0603240928o51829f9ahbfff35c4b8eafbce@mail.gmail.com> 	(jimb@red-bean.com)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove gdb/nlm subdirectory
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200603240102.RAA18110@hpsje.cup.hp.com> 	 <8f2776cb0603232024u163c75edm20eb01ff1d476d18@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20060324043008.GA5092@nevyn.them.org> <uacbg5g5v.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <20060324144727.GA15703@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0603240928o51829f9ahbfff35c4b8eafbce@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:28:58 -0800
> From: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
> 
> On 3/24/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > I'm fine with that if you'd prefer.  I think we can ignore its old
> > configure file for now, then, instead of worrying about upgrading it to
> > 2.5x (which started this discussion).
> 
> How's this, then?
> 
> src/gdb/ChangeLog:
> 2006-03-24  Jim Blandy  <jimb@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* NEWS: Mention that the 'nlm' code is on its way out.
> 	* configure.tgt: Print an error message when configured for a
> 	'-netware' target, and suggest that the user delete the code to
> 	build there.

Fine with me.