From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20174 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2006 16:57:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 20166 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2006 16:57:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:57:33 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-161-154.inter.net.il [84.228.161.154]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DFU94819 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:57:28 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060429150625.GB21836@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:06:25 -0400) Subject: Re: [RFC] problem fetching inferior memory due to breakpoint Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060426190517.GA930@adacore.com> <20060427205621.GD930@adacore.com> <20060428170001.GE930@adacore.com> <20060429142037.GA20825@nevyn.them.org> <20060429150625.GB21836@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:06:25 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:48:23PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > The MinGW compiler uses stabs by default. I used an explicit > > "-gdwarf-2" switch because I couldn't imagine the Cygwin port doesn't > > use DWARF-2. Why doesn't it? (Not that it's related to the issue at > > hand.) > > IIRC, working DWARF-2 for Cygwin is extremely recent. I doubt that it's more recent than in MinGW. And I thought, since it is supported now, everybody on this list will use it (I know _I_ do). But as I said, this is a side note.