From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1339 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2007 22:17:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 1272 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2007 22:17:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:16:59 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-122-127.inter.net.il [84.229.122.127]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BMR23320 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:16:54 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070109194954.GA30631@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:49:54 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfc] Let the remote protocol report the target's arch Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061207165207.GA16505@nevyn.them.org> <20070104221622.GM24634@nevyn.them.org> <20070105191511.GA1031@nevyn.them.org> <20070109194954.GA30631@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:49:54 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > Yes, I think using unset is better here. There's a sentence in your > > patch that says: > > > > Show the filename to read for a target description, if set. > > > > So you also refer to it as ``unset'' in some sense. > > In that case, could you take a brief look at this revised version? > I've made only minimal changes to add "unset tdesc filename" (and > corrected two embarrassing problems with "show tdesc filename"...). > > I like this version better than the one with an optional filename. Me too. Thanks.