From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@science.uva.nl>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 04:02:00 -0000
Message-id: <s3iofn1w94e.fsf@soliton.wins.uva.nl>
References: <20011011161453.A15989@nevyn.them.org> <3BCD045B.4050607@cygnus.com> <20011017002357.A25378@nevyn.them.org> <3BCDDD47.2010805@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00280.html

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

> > I used lnx-, because they needed to be 8.3 unique - isn't that
> > preferred to an entry in fnmatch.* (?)?  They were originally
> > low-linux-*.c instead, which was much more logical to me.  I'll go back
> > to that if the 8.3 conflicts are not a concern.
> 
> I think the ``keep it consistent and call it linux'' concern overrides 
> the 8.3 concern.

It just occured to me that if we really want to use a consistent
naming scheme, we should probably use CPU-OS-low.c
(i.e. i386-linux-low.c) just like we have CPU-OS-tdep.c and
CPU-OS-nat.c.