From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Convert the last FP opcode saved by FSAVE into a full opcode
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 05:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s3i1yt8m1g9.fsf@debye.wins.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200102081828.NAA25535@indy.delorie.com>
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com> writes:
> This patch restores the 5 bits of the last FP opcode which are not
> delivered by FSAVE/FXSAVE. This shows the full opcode in "info
> float", and may be used to display the opcode as a mnemonic, or look
> it up in a list of instructions.
Hmm, right now, in i387-tdep.c:i387_float_info() we have the following
code:
printf_filtered ("Opcode: %s\n",
local_hex_string_custom (fop ? (fop | 0xd800) : 0, "04"));
So I don't understand why you're missing those bits in the output of
"info float". I guess that you want "p $fop" to print the full opcode
too (without the missing bits). Back when I wrote the code I
deliberately chose to let GDB's registers contain the raw register
contents, and let the "info float" command interpret those things.
That's why I didn't include those bits. I'm also somewhat concerned
about consistency between the various x86 targets. If we apply your
patch, targets that don't use the functions from i387-nat.c still
won't include the extra bits.
That said, I'm open to discussion. If other x86 maintainers prefer $fop to
contain the full opcode your change would in principle be fine with
me. But even then, there still might be something wrong with your
patch. On UNIX, the kernel typically returns a dummy FSAVE/FXSAVE
state if the program didn't use the FPU (yet), where the opcode is all
zeroes. In that case I don't think that we want to add the 0xd800.
Mark
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-09 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200102081828.NAA25535@indy.delorie.com>
2001-02-09 5:27 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2001-02-09 6:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-13 13:55 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s3i1yt8m1g9.fsf@debye.wins.uva.nl \
--to=kettenis@wins.uva.nl \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox