From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17413 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 20:59:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17399 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 20:59:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 20:59:19 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h16KxFL09012; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:59:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Michael Elizabeth Chastain Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025 References: <20030204144415.GA30443@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 20:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 On 04 Feb 2003 14:28:35 -0800, David Carlton said: > Okay, I've upgraded binutils to 2.13.2.1; these failures go away, > along with failures on several other tests. (Though the down side is > that I can't compile all the programs in gdb.java now; a pity, but > I'll survive.) If anybody's curious, this is apparently a known bug in GCC, that has been fixed in mainline but not, I think, in branches (including 3.2.2); see for a reference. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu