From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25415 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2003 00:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25203 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2003 00:52:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.14.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2003 00:52:44 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5D0qiJd000015 for gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (jackfruit.Stanford.EDU [171.64.38.136]) by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5D0qdaH029999; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5D0qc814399; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:52:38 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] struct dictionary References: <16101.3585.739945.993550@localhost.redhat.com> <20030613001516.GD947@gnat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030613001516.GD947@gnat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:15:16 -0700, Joel Brobecker said: > Hello David, >> Okay, it's in; revised patch is below. Joel, if you could see if >> mainline works on an mdebugread target, I'd appreciate it. If it >> doesn't, any relevant information (e.g. where it crashes or hangs or >> whatever) would be greatly appreciated. > I just tested your patch on Tru64 5.1a, and did not see any > regression... Yay! I really wasn't expecting that: I mean, I tried to be careful, but mistakes are always possible in patches of that size. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu