From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20699 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 19:04:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20673 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 19:04:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 19:04:01 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA8J3sB31170; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:03:54 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Fernando Nasser , Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] linespec.c, part 1 References: <15819.53888.241829.671843@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 11:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15819.53888.241829.671843@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:04:32 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > testsuite results are same, compiled with ,-Werror, right ? As always. (I wonder what percentage of my machine's CPU time over the last two weeks has been taken up by running the testsuite after linespec changes...) > Check it in. Great, will do. I also realized I didn't put comments in front of the two new functions; I'll add that as an obvious alteration when I check it in. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu