From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6412 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 19:20:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6373 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 19:20:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 19:20:32 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0HJKVY13546; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:20:31 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/ References: <200301171900.h0HJ03A04642@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00648.txt.bz2 On 17 Jan 2003 11:16:48 -0800, David Carlton said: > I'm gradually going through the current non-{PASS,KFAIL} results > that I see on my test runs in gdb.c++, and investigating them; I'm > not distinguishing between XFAIL and FAIL (and XPASS, for that > matter) when doing so. Once I'm done with that, I'll move on to the > xfail's that I don't see; I've noticed that there are an awful lot > of DWARF 1 ones, which I assume actually are legit. Also, one thing I've noticed is that the string "FIXME" occurs a fair number of times in gdb.c++, with a similar meaning to XFAIL (and typically used in combination with XFAIL). That's another thing that has to be audited. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu