From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29108 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2003 03:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29101 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2003 03:07:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2003 03:07:59 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3F37q124309; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 20:07:52 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] annotate blocks with C++ namespace information References: <20030311171133.GA3362@nevyn.them.org> <16027.2953.467195.516437@localhost.redhat.com> <20030415020820.GB30534@nevyn.them.org> <16027.28339.641147.70506@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 03:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <16027.28339.641147.70506@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:30:11 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> I can see it either way - in symtab or in C++. Does it make sense >> to have cp-namespace.c for this, do you think? > I see it more as building language specific structures, and letting > symtabs have a pointer to those. I think the cp-namespace.c idea is > a good compromise. Okay, then that's what I'll do: I'll move the buildsym stuff into cp-namespace.c, along with whatever of the stuff I was planning to add to cp-support.c that's namespace specific. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu