From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18847-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22708 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 15:46:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22688 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 15:46:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 15:46:55 -0000
Received: (from carlton@localhost)
	by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8KFktS26483;
	Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:46:55 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <ro1ofasvf2p.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2

Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc
and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule.  Is it okay if I
rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc?  (And make the corresponding
obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.)  Or is there some other
name I should use?

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu