From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19548-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17497 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2002 20:48:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17487 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 20:48:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 20:48:09 -0000
Received: (from carlton@localhost)
	by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9MKm8x23529;
	Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:48:08 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [drow-cplus-branch rfa] using directives support
References: <ro1elaj72qn.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
	<20021022024516.GA24007@nevyn.them.org>
	<ro1wuoa5isl.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
	<20021022203222.GA6572@nevyn.them.org>
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:48:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20021022203222.GA6572@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <ro1of9m5hfb.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00420.txt.bz2

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:32:22 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:18:34PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:

>> What's the right way to do this?  regex?  There doesn't seem to
>> be anything appropriate in the C standard library.

> Well, there's strstr().

So there is; I don't know how I missed that.  (Well, I do: I was
looking for a function named something like "substring".)  Great.

>> There is one benefit to the current framework: if a user wants to
>> explicitly refer to anonymous namespaces, then it would be easier
>> for the user to just have to write '(anonymous namespace)::foo'
>> instead of some more complicated demangled thing.  But I don't know
>> how likely that is.

> But mightn't the user need to refer to more than one of the anonymous
> namespaces?

Good point.  Hmm.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu