From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25332 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2002 03:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25245 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2002 03:48:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2002 03:48:05 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7G3m4x16800; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:48:04 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch for PR gdb/574 References: <15676.21042.125481.349851@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <20020816032649.GA30528@nevyn.them.org> Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020816032649.GA30528@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 In article <20020816032649.GA30528@nevyn.them.org>, Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > This patch is approved. When your FSF papers have been processed, I > would like to see you get write-after-approval access and commit it > yourself; Andrew, does this count as "one good patch"? They seem to have been processed: I've gotten back the copy signed by the FSF. > Also, I'd appreciate it if you would submit a testsuite patch to run > the reduced testcase you wrote. More tests are always good. Great, I'll try to put together a few testsuite cases corresponding to some of my recent patches. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu