From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11308 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 18:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10335 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 18:54:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 18:54:03 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2CIrat20917; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:53:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net, bob_rossi@cox.net Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE References: <3E6E7326.3020906@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3E6E7326.3020906@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00281.txt.bz2 On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:37:10 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try to). So what's the timetable for the branch and the release, exactly? It seems like we've suddenly switched to a much more hurried mode; should the 5.4 branch be cut immediately, even before the annotation level three change gets put in, so that we can avoid putting changes that might inadvertently be destabilizing on the branch? (Obviously the annotation level 3 change would get added to the branch, as well as bugfixes.) David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu