From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7572 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 16:10:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7565 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 16:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 16:10:45 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8KGAXN26515; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:10:33 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Fernando Nasser Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc References: <20020920155144.GA10888@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020920155144.GA10888@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2 On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:51:44 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:46:54AM -0700, David Carlton wrote: >> Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc >> and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule. Is it okay if >> I rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc? (And make the corresponding >> obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.) Or is there some other >> name I should use? > I'd rather you just add them to the list; it's in > gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. Others may have a different opinion, > though.. Well, me too, actually, now that you mention the possibility. Now I'm curious about just how that list gets used, though: to run the testsuite properly, the .exp file needs to know the correct filename to compile; does somebody do that by hand? (Looking in the config/djgpp directory, I see a script 'djcheck.sh' which seems a bit strange.) To complicate matters, I see that some but by no means all of the c++ testsuite files are already listed in fnchange.lst, but with their containing directory changed from gdb.c++ to gdb.cxx. So should I add lines for all the m-static stuff to fnchange.lst, like this? @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.h @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.h @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static1.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-stat1.cc Or just one line, like this? @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static1.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-stat1.cc David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu