From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25983 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 22:42:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25975 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 22:42:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 22:42:32 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB5MgQh15013; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 14:42:26 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: PING [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members References: <15855.46570.409897.896793@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 14:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15855.46570.409897.896793@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:24:10 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > Makes sense. Hoever, could you leave the comments inside the 'then' bodies? > Like > if (blah) > { > /* C++ static member. */ > [...] > } Will do. > I think it would be useful to add a g++ version number or a date in > the comments, because at some point down the road we may want to > obsolete the old form. Right, I'll add that. > Was the patch to gcc submitted, or the gcc PR fixed otherwise? No, I can't submit the patch to GCC until a version of GDB including this patch is released, because otherwise they'll emit debugging info that we can't handle. I'll commit it with the changes to the comments that you requested. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu