From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23276 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2002 18:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23263 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2002 18:32:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2002 18:32:48 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8UIWZM22333; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:32:35 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] fnchange.lst References: From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00767.txt.bz2 On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 07:24:27 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii said: > On 27 Sep 2002, David Carlton wrote: > This one is not needed; the gdb.c++ -> gdb.cxx transformation will > be performed automatically. I see; thanks for the info. Should I go through fnchange.lst and get rid of all the gdb.c++ -> gdb.cxx transformations except for the the first one (renaming the directory) and the m-static1.cc one that I added? It seems to me that none of the others are necessary (though I'd appreciate it if you could skim the list too just to make sure I'm not missing any). David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu