From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4386 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 01:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4374 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 01:23:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 01:23:10 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1Q1N9E16936; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 17:23:09 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] gdb.c++/templates.exp, pr gdb/1063 References: <200302260115.h1Q1FNl15043@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200302260115.h1Q1FNl15043@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00686.txt.bz2 On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:15:23 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > The old style was to use gdb_test as much as possible. But I actually > like this new multi-armed gdb_expect style. Maybe when things calm down > we can move to Daniel's new gdb_test_multiple, too. Yeah, totally. I've been sticking with the old way out of laziness, justifying my behavior by the fact that I've been modifying existing tests rather than adding new tests, but certainly we should switch over to gdb_test_multiple at some point. I'm just too busy right now to think about it; once somebody else actually writes a test using it, then I'll probably adopt it myself, too. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu