From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24823 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 22:28:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24797 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 22:28:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 22:28:40 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h14MSZs01166; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:28:35 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Michael Elizabeth Chastain Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025 References: <20030204144415.GA30443@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 On 04 Feb 2003 09:16:57 -0800, David Carlton said: > Anyways, I'll upgrade my binutils when I have some free time (probably > this afternoon) and see how that affects matters. Okay, I've upgraded binutils to 2.13.2.1; these failures go away, along with failures on several other tests. (Though the down side is that I can't compile all the programs in gdb.java now; a pity, but I'll survive.) But I do see the failures that Michael reports with GCC 2.95.3 combined with DWARF 2. (In other words, failures on the tests that are smaller than ints, though not the double failure that I had been seeing with the old binutils.) So I'm leaving the PR open for now; if we ever figure out what's up with that, we can close the PR and/or XFAIL the tests, as appropriate. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu