From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24661 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2003 00:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24654 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2003 00:35:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2003 00:35:53 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1ONfGr20585; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:41:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA/symtab: Let search_symbols find exact matches References: <20030210160107.GA587@nevyn.them.org> <20030221140925.GA31205@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00623.txt.bz2 On 21 Feb 2003 09:09:18 -0800, David Carlton said: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:09:25 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: >> David, are you convinced that lookup_partial_symbol is close enough >> to what we want for the patch above? > It's close enough; on the other hand, since I'll submit a patch today > or Monday to get lookup_partial_symbol even closer to what we want, we > might as well wait until after that patch goes in before applying my > make_symbol_overload_list patch. I'll apply them both once that gets > fixed up. I've committed this now. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu