From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 993 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2003 17:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 978 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2003 17:09:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2003 17:09:21 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1LH9I526549; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:09:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA/symtab: Let search_symbols find exact matches References: <20030210160107.GA587@nevyn.them.org> <20030221140925.GA31205@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030221140925.GA31205@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00520.txt.bz2 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:09:25 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > David, are you convinced that lookup_partial_symbol is close enough > to what we want for the patch above? It's close enough; on the other hand, since I'll submit a patch today or Monday to get lookup_partial_symbol even closer to what we want, we might as well wait until after that patch goes in before applying my make_symbol_overload_list patch. I'll apply them both once that gets fixed up. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu