From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15829 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 23:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15618 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 23:42:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 23:42:57 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1ONgnA20597; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:42:49 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy Subject: Re: [rfa] delete lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms References: <20030222205011.GA25494@nevyn.them.org> <15962.25283.781474.281523@localhost.redhat.com> <15962.27382.659097.408682@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 23:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15962.27382.659097.408682@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00619.txt.bz2 On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 13:56:54 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > I am not particularly worried about the 'else' clause. I agree that > it's dumb. I think it's ok to delete that. Great. So is my original patch okay, then, or are there any modifications that you'd like me to make? It sounded earlier like the else clause was the main thing you were worried about, but maybe I misread you. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu