From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5751 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2003 17:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5743 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2003 17:14:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 21 Feb 2003 17:14:26 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1LHEHe27051; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:14:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA/symtab: Let search_symbols find exact matches References: <20030210160107.GA587@nevyn.them.org> <20030221140925.GA31205@nevyn.them.org> <15958.18025.295955.608797@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15958.18025.295955.608797@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:31:53 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > As a matter of fact, could these c++ specific functions be moved to > cp-support.c? So you guys are free to do whatever you want with > them. Makes sense to me; honestly, I don't care too much one way or another, but symtab.c is large while cp-support.c is small, so it might as well go in the latter. :-) (I think that I have some useful thoughts about how to tweak GDB's maintenance process to work around these sorts of issues, but I don't think I want to start a thread about that on a Friday; Monday, though.) David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu