From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28426 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2002 04:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28415 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 04:14:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 04:14:32 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBM4EE129331; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:14:14 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] delete 'force_return' from lookup_symbol_aux_minsyms References: <200212210710.gBL7ArG31372@duracef.shout.net> <15876.47588.348150.209939@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15876.47588.348150.209939@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:58:44 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: >> I'm not following the thread so I'm not sure what patch you're referring >> to. But if you want to give me a URL for a patch, any time this weekend >> or the beginning of next week is a good time for testbedding. >> > I am not sure if David committed it yet, but the patch it at the > bottom of: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-12/msg00560.html > Maybe you already tested it! I committed it yesterday. Though I thought some more about this last night: I'm finally starting to understand the minsym stuff. My current opinion is that deleting force_return is good, but maybe changing that lookup_symbol call within search_symbols wasn't the best idea. I'll send something more specific on Monday. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu