From: Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: minor doc fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pn8wvjf76k.fsf@delenn.bartv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uvdynnrvk.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:34:07 +0300)
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:17:02 +0100
>> From: Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com>
>> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> The text is not talking about host-side or target-side data
>> structures. It is describing a protocol, what gets transferred
>> between host and target for a gettimeofday request, which
>> happens to be 12 bytes and not 8.
Eli> Sorry, you lost me. Perhaps I'm confused, but `long' takes 8
Eli> bytes only on 64-bit Unix machines. Otherwise it's 4 bytes.
Eli> What am I missing?
That we are talking about a communication protocol which is
independent of any given architecture.
On an embedded target, the target-side stub code can send a packet
Fgettimeofday,<buf1>,<buf2> to the host-side gdb. This is part of the
remote protocol as documented in appendix D, "GDB Remote Serial
Protocol" of the gdb info pages. Communication can happen over a
serial line, a network socket, whatever. The Fgettimeofday packet is
part of the File-I/O Remote Protocol Extension documented in that
appendix.
<buf1> is a pointer to a target-side buffer where gdb should store the
desired information. The protocol specification says that the first 4
bytes of that buffer will be filled with the tv_sec value in
big-endian format, and the next 8 bytes of that buffer will be filled
with the tv_usec value, again in big-endian format. When gdb resumes
the target, target-side code is responsible for converting the
contents of that buffer into appropriate data structures. That may
involve swapping the endianness, truncating the 8 bytes of tv_usec
data to the 4 bytes that are actually required, whatever.
The current documentation states that that target-side buffer only
needs to be 8 bytes, not 12, so anybody implementing target-side code
may reserve insufficient memory. Result: confusion and memory
corruption.
Bart
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 15:55 Bart Veer
2008-07-30 17:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-30 18:17 ` Bart Veer
2008-07-30 18:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-30 18:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-30 19:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-30 19:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-30 20:28 ` Bart Veer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pn8wvjf76k.fsf@delenn.bartv.net \
--to=bartv@ecoscentric.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox