From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17942 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2005 13:46:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17908 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jul 2005 13:46:41 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 13:46:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j64DkdrP029061 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:46:39 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j64DkdV17163; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:46:39 -0400 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn50-47.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.47]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j64DkcFi013423; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:46:38 -0400 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j64Dkbjo026888; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:46:37 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j64DkZ0F026883; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:46:35 -0300 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Ben Elliston , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH Makefile.in References: <20050630063814.A8532@mailhub.air.net.au> <20050703190609.GK13811@nevyn.them.org> From: Alexandre Oliva Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 13:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050703190609.GK13811@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Jul 3, 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:53:20PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Jun 29, 2005, Ben Elliston wrote: >> >> > There is no longer an in-tree version of DejaGnu in src/dejagnu. This >> > patch just keeps the gdb Makefile up to date. >> >> Not really. It has no advantage whatsoever for those who no longer >> have dejagnu/runtest in their build trees, but it breaks for those who >> happen to do. I don't think it's enough of a clean-up to be worth >> the potential hassle. > I don't want to carry this baggage around forever. We already rely on > plenty of installed tools; I think it's long past time to add expect > and dejagnu to the list. This is an argument for the removal of dejagnu and expect from the tree, which I agree with. It's the one-line change in the test to decide which RUNTEST to use that I'm opposing. I can't imagine such a line is too much baggage to carry around. If you think so, well... I guess I'll just shut up and wait until your next ports require changes in dejagnu. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}