On Mar  7, 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:02:40AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

>> Here's what I'm checking in, in the hopes that the archoring you
>> suggested above is not needed, otherwise I'll take care of it in a
>> subsequent patch.

> Please fix the anchoring.

In the following patch, that I'm checking in as obvious, I fix
anchoring and also tidy up some code added in the original prelink
patch, such that it's absolutely obvious that the l_addr field is
properly initialized in all cases.