From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6345 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 04:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6336 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 04:27:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2002 04:27:00 -0000 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn3-2.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.2]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4E4Pav20866; Mon, 13 May 2002 21:25:37 -0700 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4E4QpG05807; Tue, 14 May 2002 01:26:51 -0300 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove sh-hms target References: <15584.19286.75849.849229@localhost.redhat.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 21:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15584.19286.75849.849229@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00529.txt.bz2 On May 13, 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote: > The sh-hms target wasn't really doing anything different from sh-elf > for what gdb was concerned. It built exactly the same set of files. Hmm... AFAIK, sh-hms is a variant of sh-coff, not sh-elf. Shouldn't it be retained at least as an alias? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer