From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32663 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2001 07:19:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32553 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 07:19:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 07:19:27 -0000 Received: from fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA14416; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 23:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [192.168.160.1]) by fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAF7JKD30021; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:19:20 -0200 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fAF7JHN22048; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:19:17 -0200 X-Authentication-Warning: free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br: aoliva set sender to aoliva@redhat.com using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, jeffh@redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh References: <200111141733.LAA24289@duracef.shout.net> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 08:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:33:14 -0600" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Nov 14, 2001, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Alexandre Oliva asked me to mark this change as "gcc-local" in the > gcc sources; I don't remember the reasoning behind this. The reason was that libtool had already diverged significantly from what we had been using, and the libtool branch from which I had been doing imports into gcc and src were regarded as dead by other libtool folks. I felt importing libtool mainline was inappropriate for GCC 3.0, and then, when the same problems were reported against GCC mainline, I still hadn't had time to test it against libtool mainline, so I went ahead and just merged the known-to-work files from GCC 3.0, but failed to apply the same patch in src. Now Jeff ran into the same problem using src's top level, so I suggested him to just merge these files. I shall look into doing a proper merge from libtool, but I haven't had time to even open my libtool e-mail folders in the past few months :-( -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me