From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14589 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2003 12:45:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14562 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2003 12:45:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2003 12:45:00 -0000 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (aoliva.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.10]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h0QCivg07290; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 07:44:57 -0500 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h0QCiufZ019385; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:44:56 -0200 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h0QCiuNs019381; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:44:56 -0200 To: Phil Edwards Cc: Nathanael Nerode , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (toplevel patch) Use canonical names for target_subdir, build_subdir. References: <20030124034053.GA22615@doctormoo> <20030126122246.GA7985@disaster.jaj.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030126122246.GA7985@disaster.jaj.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00724.txt.bz2 On Jan 26, 2003, Phil Edwards wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:50:21PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> >> > Use the canonical build and target names for build_subdir and target_subdir. >> >> Not ok. athlon-linux-gnu is canonicalized to i686-linux-gnu, so we >> can't use the same directories for both of them. (Consider building a >> compiler on athlon that must run on i686, or on the other way round). > So, is this going to be reverted or not? It's destroying the testsuite > results. Please go ahead and revert it. It must have gone in by mistake, since it was explicitly rejected. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer