On Mar  4, 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:

> Hmm, two things: I don't think a WARNING is appropriate (there's
> nothing wrong), how about just an UNTESTED?

Sure.

> And, when matching
> patterns in gdb_test_multiple (the same was true in gdb_expect)
> it's important to anchor the end of the pattern to the GDB prompt.
> Otherwise that prompt might not be consumed by expect, causing
> new tests added at the end of the file to fail.

Oh?  I thought gdb_test_multiple would only exit when it got to a
prompt or something, so it would be consumed automatically.  Is that
not so?

> If you agree about the UNTESTED, with those changes it's fine to check
> in.  My test runs thank you.

Here's what I'm checking in, in the hopes that the archoring you
suggested above is not needed, otherwise I'll take care of it in a
subsequent patch.