From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9410 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2001 05:17:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9064 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2001 05:16:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2001 05:16:20 -0000 Received: from fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11990; Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:16:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [192.168.160.1]) by fri.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBG5GFZ25780; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 03:16:15 -0200 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBG5GFn09662; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 03:16:15 -0200 X-Authentication-Warning: free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br: aoliva set sender to aoliva@redhat.com using -f To: Andrew Cagney Cc: law@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: configure patch for hpux References: <2308.1008226239@porcupine.cygnus.com> <3C1B7E93.3040102@cygnus.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of "Sat, 15 Dec 2001 11:47:15 -0500" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On Dec 15, 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Would this -Ae vs -Aa going to be accepted into the master sources. AFAIK, they're already fixed in the master sources, in the sense that autoconf 2.5x has a macro that replaces that in automake with the right semantics. But I don't know for sure, I haven't looked at autoconf and automake for a while (6 months or so :-( > If it isn't, should GDB change the name so that there isn't any confusion? Renaming the macro is a good idea. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me