From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17819 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2005 17:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17812 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2005 17:53:25 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 17:53:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j62HrOhA027890 for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 13:53:24 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j62HrOu26509; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 13:53:24 -0400 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn50-53.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.53]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j62HrN3Q009634; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 13:53:23 -0400 Received: from livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j62HrMPf007227; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:53:22 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j62HrL4f007224; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:53:21 -0300 To: Ben Elliston Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH Makefile.in References: <20050630063814.A8532@mailhub.air.net.au> From: Alexandre Oliva Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 17:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050630063814.A8532@mailhub.air.net.au> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 On Jun 29, 2005, Ben Elliston wrote: > There is no longer an in-tree version of DejaGnu in src/dejagnu. This > patch just keeps the gdb Makefile up to date. Not really. It has no advantage whatsoever for those who no longer have dejagnu/runtest in their build trees, but it breaks for those who happen to do. I don't think it's enough of a clean-up to be worth the potential hassle. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}